What works about Thor
Man, did I not have high hopes for Thor. The trailer left me with an overwhelming sense of, “meh” and a fair amount of disappointment that after two highly enjoyable films, Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk, The Avengers origin stories were about to turn a little lame.
I was…mistaken. I was very mistaken. This is a fun movie.
Here’s what works:
1. Lets start with the obvious win here: Chris Hemsworth. An Australian born actor best known in this country for his brief but memorable turn as George Kirk in the recent reboot of Star Trek, this tall, blond, beast of a man is well cast in the role of the god of thunder and lightning. Not only does he look the part, but would you believe this guy can hold his own in scenes with the likes of Anthony Hopkins? Oh, he can. He’s charming when he needs to be charming, petulant and arrogant when he needs to be, and when he is crushed and humbled, you believe he is crushed and humbled.
Oh, and when he fights? Yeah, he can pull that off too.
I’m a big fan of all of the already released movies leading up to next year’s release of The Avengers and before seeing Thor I would have argued it would be nigh on impossible to pull off better casting than Robert Downey, Jr. as Tony Stark. Hemsworth has proven that statement incorrect, in my book anyway. We’ll see if Chris Evans can outshine him in Captain America, due out later this year, but I have my doubts.
2. Chris Hemsworth…again, and this time I’m putting down my objective reviewer pen and picking up my 30-something-woman-with-needs pen. My alternate title for this blog was “I just got back from seeing Thor and boy are my ovaries tired.” Seriously, they kicked out so many eggs during the shirtless scene, it was like a farmer’s market down there.
The man can wink, he can kiss your hand, he can smash a mug and say he meant no offense, all with a playful charm that isn’t as easy to pull off as you might think. Not all hot guys can be charming. In fact, a lot of them kind of seem like douchebags. This guy can do charming. He can also do angry, I’ll kick your ass and that’s cool, too.
3. Kenneth Branagh – Remember when KB was all the rage for Henry V and Hamlet? I know he’s fallen a bit out of fashion lately, but this Shakespearian trained actor/director brings something to this script that is badly needed. I wish I could say exactly what it is, but I can’t be certain because I don’t know enough about how the whole directing thing works. This is a predictable movie, with a plot outlandish enough to alienate mainstream audiences if done poorly (rainbow bridges and alien planets are just the beginning). Luckily, Branagh is not one to do something poorly. Something about his directing gives the events of the film legitimacy. Most things work, even the things that are over the top. There is a great scene involving dropping coffee cups and cartoon-style open mouths akin to a classic spit take that works in spite of itself – little things like that, he and his actors pull off beautifully.
Perhaps because of his experience with The Bard, he also creates a sense of weight and importance to the dramatic scenes that could be considered cheesy and over done under another director’s leadership.
4. The connections to and foreshadowing of the other soon-to-be Avengers movie. This franchise is being very well played. I don’t want to give anything away, but for those in the know, there is plenty to be excited about. And, of course, please stay until the credits have ended.
5. Colm Feore. OK, I know he was mostly CGI in this movie, but I’m a fan and that Colm Feore menace he brought Storm of the Century comes through as Laufey, leader of the Frost Giants.
While all the above makes Thor a highly enjoyable experience, not everything works. Here’s a few things that don’t do it for me:
1. The Jane/Thor romance. I’m a Natalie Portman fan from way back in the day when she made her debut in The Professional at the age of 12 or so, but I have to tell you she is wasted in this role. Hemsworth is so perfectly cast that he dwarfs her in more than just the literal sense. She’s beautiful to be sure, and she too can pull off charming and and funny, but there is no zing to their chemistry and no meat to her role as a scientist. I can’t blame Portman, but something doesn’t work about this pairing.
2. The marginalization of Thor’s friends. You get the feeling that these guys (Lady Sif, Volstagg, Fandral and Hogun) are going to be more important later, but in this film their presence feels more obligatory than important. I liked what I saw of them, however, and hope to see more in either The Avengers or the very likely sequels to Thor.
Some things about which I’m on the fence.
- The Earth crew of Dr. Selvig (Stellen Skarsgard), Darcy Lews (Kat Dennings) and Jane Foster (Portman). Kat Dennings is quirky and fun without being cliched, but Skarsgard and Portman are in the same “meh” boat by way of script in this one. They are a fun trio and provide some nice comedic moments, but while it’s not worse than any other straightman crew, it’s not better either.
- Loki. Played by Tom Hiddleston, I’m not sure this character was mischievous enough to be the god of mischief. Still, mostly I liked him in this role. Mostly. Edited 4/23/2012 – after watching this for the third time (hey, I’m getting ready for my Avengers Boot Camp, Thor edition – it’s my job to watch it) I have to say this character has grown on me. There was never any denying the actor is talented, but I’ve come to appreciate more the much needed element of darkness, even a hint of melodrama, he brings to the film to act as a balance to the humor and joviality of Thor, as Thor lives some of his life on Earth – and vise versa, actually. I still don’t feel the sense of mischief I want coming from him, but he is very smart, wounded, and menacing. That’s pretty good for a villain.

All in all, Thor has a few weaknesses that may turn off those who respond only to the very best the genre has to offer, but for this particular geek, it worked far more often, and in more important ways, than it didn’t.
GO SEE IT. I command thee!
10 Responses to What works about Thor
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Stuff we geek out about…
- A Little Something for the Fellas (2)
- A Little Something for the Ladies (9)
- Avengers Boot Camp (9)
- Before the Movie – Trailers (13)
- Editorials and Reviews (136)
- Books and Comics (51)
- Movies (50)
- Television (49)
- Interviews (19)
- Con-versations (4)
- Geek of the Week (12)
- Miscellaneous Geekery (48)
- Nostalgia (17)
- Sandman Re-Read (11)
- Three Favorite Things (4)
What we JUST said…
- They Can’t All Be Buffys-Zombieland the Pilot
- All the Posts I Meant to Write this Month, Abridged
- Hemlock Grove-A New Guilty Pleasure
- Deborah Harkness and A Discovery of Witches
- Syfy’s Defiance- Hope They Didn’t Blow the Budget on a Song
- Cover Reveal for the New Liz Long Novel Witch Hearts
- From Gen-X, To Chris Hardwick With Love
Recent comments…
Blogroll
- Captain Awkward Advice. Staircase Wit. Faux Pas. Movies.
- Get Geek Just what it sounds like.
- L33T Webcomics
- Martin Millar's Blog Neil Gaiman likes him and so should you
- Neil Gaiman's Journal You’re probably already reading it but if you’re not, you should be
- Word of the Nerd I think the title says it all
non-geeky sites from friends
- Jess Dewes photography Looking for an amazing photographer in the St. Louis area? Look no further
- Living on Love A great mix of thoughts, many (but not nearly all) on motherhood, from a talented co-worker
- Mama's Milk & Honey Thoughts from a brand new mom.
- Narkarts (hand crafted wooden puzzle boxes) How puzzling, a puzzle box
- T&A Boutique (who doesn't love a little t&a) Vintage & handmade items & a wicked sense of humour
- The Ministry of Pie A good friend writes AMAZING blogs about baking and food.
- This Blue Bird Vintage clothing, jewelry, furniture and more!











Thanks for the review. I may go see it, now. Two things:
1. “…it was like a farmer’s market down there.” Thank you for my daily at work cackle. No pun. Okay, yeah, pun.
2. Not to be a spelling nazi, but *lightning.
Huzzah! If only you could have been drinking coffee and spit it out as you read it.
Also, I’m GLAD you caught and pointed out the spelling error. It has since been corrected.
Cheers.
I have to agree with ovine Bob on this this one. The entire “farmer’s market” paragraph nearly made me pee myself.
Colm’s SK movie was “Storm of the Century” and man was he creepy. And I still need to plug this wee short film Thor was in…(along with Norman Reedus)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu9SIDBEYgQ
Haven’t seen Thor yet (bad geek!) but I will, of course. And glad to hear about Kenneth Branagh back on his game.
I pretty much agree with your assessment of this movie, except that I thought Loki was pretty darned good. I liked his anger and hurt at being second banana to Thor as well as finding out his true parentage. Since this is an origin movie, I’m sure we’ll see more of his evil side in future films. Also, Colm Feore has said in several interviews that he was in full makeup/prosthetics, not CG, though he does appear larger than other characters. I thought the makeup and red eyes was well done and he makes a first-class villain!
Knowing that was make-up and camera tricks makes me enjoy that character even more. I’ll have to see it again…which I don’t mind at all, for many reasons. Thanks for bringing that to my attention!
I agree that Loki was portrayed well, just not “mischievious” per se. I wanted to see him have more fun being bad. That being said, I look forward to seeing what he brings to the role in future films, as I did see hints of a glint in his eye toward the end of Thor.
The overall story didn’t work for me, but I agree with you on all the positive points, and many of the not-so-positive ones.
Can I say something, one girl geek to another? Am I the only one tired of the “tidbit after the credits” thing that’s been going around in the big films (especially the geeky ones) for the last 10 years? Hollywood, I beg of you: stop it. If you want me to see it, put it before the credits. Don’t make me sit in the half-brightened theater with the young man/woman standing there patiently waiting with broom and dustpan in hand for me to get a half-second chuckle out of a throwaway scene.
Can I be the only one that feels this way?
Ha! Jen, no, I’m with you on that. Especially after Thor. The theater had the volume up SO LOUD that I wanted nothing more than to get out of there and give my ears a break when the movie had ended, but I knew I had to subject them to more torture to see the bit at the end.
I am someone who likes to watch the credits roll until the end (I like seeing the musical credits), but I don’t like feeling as if I HAVE to stay, that I might miss something if I do not stay. Those extra bits pack a more powerful punch when they are unexpected and few and far between.
I agree with both your high points and your low points (especially that Loki was just your cliched “But *I* wanna be king!” little sh!t). There was something that bothered me more though, and that’s Dr. Blake. I always felt like that duality was central to Thor’s character. The superhero who is actually a bonafide god is also a cripple and a healer. I think that learning how and when to use his power to change was as big a part of Thor’s origin story as Peter Parker’s famous “With great power comes great responsibility” moment. Instead, the movie made a joke out of it. The only reason I think that it worked at all without the dual identity is that Thor went home. Just chilling on Earth as a BAMF space-viking would have been unacceptable.